Search results

Do you? Why would taking their public genome database offline be evidence? Especially because you just posted in response to someone showing evidence disproving genetic manipulation, that there might not have been. Having an event happen years before or not showing it to people who have no...

I'm not sure you have since the concerns you mention are in the US, and this law was passed in Norway.

Who says you have to? The law in the article applies to wearables, so your argument is only a problem if someone wrote a new law to apply it to other things. At that point you could get mad about that.

"Guys, racism is totally valid as long as you have geopolitical conflicts"

I'm kinda for it. If it's supposedly not economical for your industry to exist without an effective monopoly of 2 - 3 players, then it must not be a good fit for private business and should be nationalized.

Kind of crazy argument to make when emotional distress is a type of injury that the law recognizes as valid for standing.

It's a gift to the rest of us. If they are busy telling us it's a doom machine to bring doom, they can't really object to everyone asking them to just turn it all off right?

Is it useful enough to kill everyone for? One of things most disconcerting about AI is that most of its biggest proponents are willing to say in public that they think it has a not insignificant chance of killing everyone. Under that framework, is AI worth it for some productivity gains and...

That other humans will stop you. Most of the people with all the bombs and aircraft will want to let it keep running

It's intellectually lazy that reforms to prevent corruption and a 2nd Trump term failed in the last Administration, yet here we are.

You just don't get it, the generational change in models means I have had generational changes in my code! I'm producing 100x the code I never produced before! My emotional stability is now the only thing preventing me from trying to hack a bank, as we all know laws are an antiquated idea that...

With the human guards outside ordered to keep protecting them until after it's too late to meaningfully stop them.

Why wouldn't you? Lack of coherent policy has made plenty of US allies less inclined to be. It's like the Iran war, of no one thinks you are a rational, coherent actor then it isn't worth it to sign any kind of deal with you because you'll break it in 2 weeks. The only upside to having...

My only quibble would be how would you know from this study if AI is making underemployment worse? It seems like from the methodology presented, you can't.

Great, a standard insurance company. I guess the good news for Medicare for all would be that at least it would still simplify billing departments.

I'm not sure this study actually really deals with the opposite results from the Stanford study. One of the important questions to know if AI is replacing entry level work is would be if you are meaningfully employed in the field that you graduated in, looking purely at the unemployment rate...

Ah yes, the libertarian utopia where the only role government has is to point guns at you

I honestly don't find it more scary than a world where humans sit at desks and drop bombs on civilians and go home to there family every night. Or where we already have seen both public and private armies used to subdue protestors. An automated computer might target and kill you is scary, but...

Wouldn't that be Poly market's problem not New York?

Okay, so why are you being a pervert and wanting someone raped?