TIME For Kids - No Artist Required

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views5 pages
Ammaar Reshi used AI tools, ChatGPT and Midjourney, to create a children's book titled 'Alice and Sparkle,' sparking a debate on the implications of AI in art. While some praised his innovation, many artists criticized the use of AI, arguing it exploits their work without consent. Concerns are growing about the future of human creativity as companies increasingly opt for AI-generated content over traditional artistic talent.

Uploaded by

Walt Disney
License
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SUMMER SAVINGS! SUBSCRIBE & SAVE 10%!

ORDER NOW
×
Technology | Arts

No Artist Required
March 9, 2023

Nik Popli for TIME, adapted by TFK editors

COURTESY AMMAAR RESHI

One day, Ammaar Reshi was playing around with a chatbot called ChatGPT.

A chatbot is a computer program that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to


imitate human thinking and writing. Reshi wondered if he could use the

program to produce a children’s book.


The idea for the book’s story came from a conversation Reshi had with the

chatbot, about a girl named Alice. He created illustrations using another AI


program, Midjourney, which translates words into images.

SMART ART These book illustrations were made by an AI program. The

book’s text was also produced using AI.


COURTESY AMMAAR RESHI

A couple of days later, Reshi had completed a 12-page book, Alice and
Sparkle. “Anyone can use these [AI] tools,” he told TIME. “[They’re] readily

accessible, and not hard to use.”

Not everyone was pleased. When Reshi posted about the book on Twitter, a

debate started. Some people praised him for his ingenuity. But artists were
critical. The problem, they said, was not just the poor quality of the artwork
(for instance, in one drawing, hands look like claws). It was the way the art

was made.

COURTESY AMMAAR RESHI

Midjourney searches through millions of images across the Internet. It uses

algorithms to find patterns in those images and create new ones. Think of
the artists who upload their work online. Midjourney could be using their
work without their permission.

“The main problem to me about AI is that it was trained off of artists’ work,”
illustrator Adriane Tsai says. “It’s our creations, our distinct styles . . . that
we did not consent to being used.”

For Art’s Sake


COURTESY AMMAAR RESHI

Many artists and writers are nervous about their future. Will people pay

them for their work if it can be done cheaper using AI?

Some companies are already choosing AI over human talent. The San

Francisco Ballet used images generated by Midjourney to promote its


production of The Nutcracker. At a comedy club, an AI- powered robot
delivered jokes.

“As somebody who makes my money and finds my joy in writing, it’s deeply
troubling to see people seeking cheap alternatives to actual human writing,”
journalist Abraham Josephine Riesman says.

Reshi says there should be protections for artists and authors whose work
might be used in AI algorithms. “There’s real concern,” he says. “It’s really
important that the tech industry that’s working on these tools involves
[artists] in the process of creation.”

You might also like